BILLY CORGAN Talks D’ARCY WRETZKY’s Role In THE SMASHING PUMPKINS’ OG Era: “Her Contribution Had A Lot To Do With The Success Of The Band”

The history of The Smashing Pumpkins is as much about chemistry as it is about catalog. In a recent Substack video, Billy Corgan took time to reassess the contribution of original bassist D’Arcy Wretzky, framing her presence as central to how the classic lineup operated and made decisions. The comments arrive after years of well-documented tensions, the sort of split that usually stays behind closed doors. Here, Corgan chose to zoom in on what worked.

“I don’t often speak on D’Arcy‘s contribution, because obviously what went down a few years ago didn’t leave either one of us in the best light. But, I’ve said it before, and I have no problem saying it again. D’Arcy had a way of kind of letting it be known – stuff that she thought was moving the band forward, or moving the band laterally, or moving the band backwards,” Corgan shared (via Ultimate Guitar).

“And probably, of the four of us, her opinion about those types of things carried more weight. So her contribution, kind of spiritually, emotionally, I think, had a lot to do with the success of the band. So again, I would never take that away from her, because I really did respect her musical opinion,” Corgan continued. “We managed to disagree about everything else, but in music, when we would align, it was powerful. And I think that’s what makes a great band, when the four contributing factors of a band can come together.”

Corgan’s words ring as a notable recalibration. For those who’ve traced the band’s arcs and off-shoots, the message is abundantly clear: beyond who played what, Corgan credits Wretzky with a barometer’s sense of direction, the internal call on whether a move pushed the group forward or sideways. That kind of internal editor is rare, and in heavy guitar music it can be the difference between volume and voice.

“And at least for that lineup, the OG lineup, the three records we made, I mean, two of the three records turned out to be very important. So that’s something I always hold. It’s a shame there wasn’t more of it, and we certainly did try again in ’99. I guess in a musician’s life, nothing is truly linear,” he reflected. “But in the linear timeline of my musical life, I mean, I look at those years between ’92 and ’96, ’97, you know, it was the alignment of the four people that really made for the music having that little bit of extra edge, that little bit extra clarification, or even if you want to call it a collective voice. It’s difficult because, unless you were there, you can’t really understand what we did together and what I did on my own.”

Don’t worry if you can’t name the records the run he’s pointing to. What matters in his telling is the alignment: four personalities syncing into a singular attack that sharpened the songwriting and gave the dynamics their bite. That’s the sort of alchemy rock listeners recognize: a moment when parts lock and the air in the room changes.

“We liked to work fast. We arranged fast. We practiced fast. We worked fast. So having producers that were willing to move that quickly to take advantage of what we were good at in the moment, which is also, I think, why we were such a powerful live band. We had the ability to show up in a moment and deliver an energy that wouldn’t necessarily be there the next day. It was like quicksilver.”

MELANCHOLY AND I: 30th ANNIVERSARY SPECTACULAR by ORANGE FADES TO GRAY: A recording from ORANGE FADES TO GRAY’s live video

Read on Substack